Hello Maurice,

On 26 Feb 16 01:23, Maurice Kinal wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> it displays your Mööse just fine.

 MK> Huh?  What's with the Swedish Møøse?  Don't you know there is no
 MK> such thing?

Just giving you some UTF-8 text, is all. I see and can write the same as you, I
just went with the first ALT combination I could think of. :)

 MK> ... or at least the Swedish appear confused about it's actual label.
 MK> The Norse/Dane Møøse is definetly the way to go.

 NB>> But when I shell to nano to reply, the Russian characters and
 NB>> whatever else show up just fine.

 MK> I noticed there is a new nano release but still haven't taken it out
 MK> for a spin.  I didn't notice any mention of a soft wrap fix in the
 MK> Changelog.

I'm currently using 2.5.2 on both of my systems, and haven't had a problem with
it.

 NB>> So all in all, Golded works fine enough on Linux.

 MK> Bah!  Msged was better although I used vim as the backend for any
 MK> serious, hardcore messaging ... as it *should* be.  Having said that,
 MK> I still think the WeBeBashing/vim combo is superior despite the lack
 MK> of curses based menuing/lists/etc.  Maybe one of these days but I have
 MK> doubts.

Msged may be similar, but I don't think it's better whatsoever. They both look
at the same translation files.. so there's really no comparison.

As for WeBeBashing, as I've always told you, once you get it user/sysop
friendly.. I'll give it a test run (which may in fact require curses based
menuing/lists/etc). :) 

Regards,
Nick

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160201