| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Compiling husky: no rules |
Tach auch Felipe! Am 31 Aug 06, Felipe T. Dorado schrieb an Kai Richter: FD>>> gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2) KR>> Hm, i don't know if that version will be fine for husky, but i KR>> hope you can tell us later. :) FD> So far no problems on that front. That is great. Thanks for telling! FD> Users are not programmers. I do agree. FD>>> - copied huskymak.cfg from smapi/debian directory to the top FD>>> level KR>> Why? Who told you so? FD> ... I have the husky files I downloaded about a year and a half ago FD> and had a go at compiling those first, kind of trial. Since I wasn't FD> getting very far I started afresh with the actual stable releases at FD> sf. ... With all that and my inexperience I got mistaken. :( Hm. I remember there was a change in huskybase, some content moved to other modules. The huskymak.cfg had some changes too, also the format of the fidoconfig "config" file. (Thats why there is a version keyword now.) That is a possible trap. If you try to compile older husky stuff and mix those files they may not fit correctly. With all files actual stable-RC it should be no problem. FD> Yeap, checked that the general makefile uses /etc/fido and the debian FD> one uses /etc/husky. I'm afraid no make install created any dir in FD> /etc :( I can't remember, i think i did it manually. And i have a symbolic link "husky" in my homedir, pointing to the correct dir. FD> Ok, all this is fine if one uses the debian make file. I did not. And FD> you seem to imply that I should have. But the manual leaves that as an FD> option, right :? Right, that is the best of linux, you are the boss and can do it your way. ;-) The only thing you must do is saying: Trust me, i know what i do! ;-) KR>> I think the other values of huskymak.cfg.debian are good default. FD> So, I should compile again but using: FD> make -f huskymak.cnf.debian and FD> make -f huskymak.cnf.debian install FD> instead of the general make file. Is that right? You are the boss. If you have everything up and running without trouble you do not need to do that. FD> you probably take for granted that what you see in the dirs is the FD> same I see ... No, I'm just a user that can read but not program ;) Me too. :) But if you found the "entry point" it is not that difficult to follow the way what happend. Just open your eyes - a the right point. :) KR>> (you don't need luck to install husky ;-) FD> Sure? Alright, off the window go the dice! ;DDD Lol! :) KR>> If your points use the same Debian Version like you do, you can KR>> use DYNLIBS=0 and give them the ready compiled binaries. FD> Let me make sure mine do work first. Good idea. KR>> I still have problems to install Debian to my node with some hpt KR>> controller, FD> Ah, no "problemo" ;) Just ask me! };) I caught your dice. :) Tschuess Kai --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7* Origin: Monobox migrating to Linux (2:244/1351.7) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 244/1351 1500 1200 2432/200 2411/413 20/11 237/9 236/150 261/38 123/500 @PATH: 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.