| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM First Question |
From: "Frank Q" To: "John Sherman" , Reply-To: "Frank Q" Hi All /////////// lots of snipping ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Sherman" > magnified, and so the disc still subtends the same angle on the sky. As was > pointed out, that angle is 2.44 lambda/D, usually given in arc-seconds. It > is not dependent on the magnification, or even the f/#. > > Why not?? /////////// end of snip The quantity (2.44 lambda/D) is related to the angular resolution of the telescope. The resolution is 1.22 lambda/D. The angular resolution is independent of focal length, F/# etc etc. It only depends on the diameter of your mirror. All that FL or F/# do is specify where and how big the final airy disk will be. If two point sources are located such that the angle they subtend at the mirror is less than the angular resolution of the mirror, then their airy disks will overlap. Varying the FL or F/# will not separate them. Varying the FL / F/# will just give a bigger (or smaller) image (at the focal plane) of two overlapping airy disks. If lambda and D are specified in the same units then (1.22 lambda/D) will be the angular resolution of the telescope in radians when it is viewing something at a wavelength of lambda. This will have to be converted to arc-seconds by someone at some stage. Incidentally, the resolution of a mirror will be about twice as good for objects viewed in blue light (lambda = 0.4 microns) compared to objects viewed in red light (lambda = 0.7 microns approx). Cheers Frank Q --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.