WC> RH>>full. Often overflowing with care.

WC> MG> Yes, that is true. I've done some volunteer work with ARC and
WC> MG> "slow" people aren't all screwed up with hate and
anger and just
WC> MG> want to love people, some of the sweetest kindest people I've
WC> MG> ever known are "slow". You're not buying into the obvious lie
WC> MG> that Wayne has (or ever had) an IQ of 137 are you?

WC> AH> I've never seen a reason to mention my I.Q. in an echo, and I
WC> AH> don't plan to (I did on one web board years ago, in a thread
WC> AH> that directed users to an I.Q. test site and asked them to post
WC> AH> results.  I don't know how accurate those tests are, but I must
WC> AH> admit that, in my case, the test result almost exactly matched
WC> AH> the result of an I.Q. test a psychologist had given me a few
WC> AH> years before.) Why is such information pertinent to a political
WC> AH> echo?  Having a high I.Q. doesn't mean a person can't do stupid
WC> AH> things, or make stupid decisions, just as a low I.Q. person
WC> AH> isn't damned to never do anything smart.

WC> AH> Wayne may have a 137 I.Q., but that has nothing to do with
WC> AH> deciding political positions.  *adh*

WC>Wayne hasn't had an IQ of 137 in quite some time.

I am quite sure nobody will argue with this.


WC>Tested in H.S. it was 137 and among the top 2 percent.
WC>Tested in in 1995 I only ranked in the top 5 percent whatever
WC>that translates to.

And yet look what he accomplished with it.


WC>Today rather less and on the decline.

From all outside appearances, a rather steep decline.


Jeff


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10