| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: My Website Has Been Taken Down |
On Jan 22, 12:04=A0am, "Bill Buckels" wrote: > That is true of course and nobody is trying to take away Vince's copyrigh= t, > reverse engineer his product, or steal his copyright which by the way is = on > the source code and NOT on the binary copy. > > I think despite the fact that the US provides the usual silo-istic > perspective, one needs to understand that there are many other countries > with a less-mercenary social framework that balance intellectual property > against the public's rights. In all fairness there are also other countri= es > who suppress individual rights and public rights altogether except > selectively, although this is kind-of like not being able to afford a law= yer > in the US:) And that's precisely it: the purpose of Copyright is to balance the rights of individuals/organisations vs. the public interest. Some people here seem to be under the mistaken impression that if an act violates Copyright then act is absolutely illegal, when in reality Copyright violations must be evaluated both with respect to both Copyright and other existing laws in a given jurisdiction. Where other laws contradict Copyright, they almost invariably take precedence. For example, the WIPO recommendations that were implemented as the DMCA in the US (and carried over to countries that have FTA's with the US) directly violate parts of the Trade Practices Act in Australia and New Zealand. What does this mean in practice? The classic example is DVD region coding. Selling a locked player is a violation of the Trade Practices Act, since it prevents consumers from playing media they've legitimately acquired. The fact that the DMCA empowers copyright holders to prosecute those who bypass their encryption locks is irrelevant in this context. If we're lucky, some smart legilstator will propose an "Abandonware" clause that would allow software such as this to be distributed without fear of reprisal. Of course, whether the hands of vested interests would ever allow such a clause to enter the law is a matter for an entirely different debate. Matt --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Derby City Gateway (1:2320/0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 222/2 226/0 236/150 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1404 1406 1410 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 393/11 396/45 633/260 267 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 SEEN-BY: 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 2320/0 100 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.