*Strawman* purchases are a violation of Federal Law......buried somewhere in
legislation called the Brady Act, as I recall.  Could be interesting to see
how the Fed's weigh in on this.  --JB
"RedFish"  wrote in message
news:FXvn8.71039$2u5.98629796@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Sarah Brady took her grief for her husband and translated that into
> something evil.  Something *SHE believed should be pressed onto every
other
> American citizen simply because *She thought it should be.  She determined
> that SHE was right and everyone else was wrong.
> And from that initiated steps to take away the Constitutional rights of
> everyone.
>
> Break a *gun* law?  Perhaps not.....but she did break a multitude of other
> *laws.
> Just as Hitler and Hussein structured societies to suit *their beliefs and
> ideas.....Brady is no less guilty.
> Just as a thief will steal money in cases where they *believe it is owed
> them because of what society has "done to them"; Sarah Brady has stolen
> ethics, morals, safety and lives from millions and millions of innocent
> citizens because she felt she was "owed" something as well.
>
> She should be imprisoned no more or less than the man who shot her
> husband....because in effect, she took the very *same weapon that the
> shooter had and attempted to kill everyone else with it.
>
> Thank God common sense prevailed in the end....but that makes her no less
> the guilty.
>
> --
> Randy RedFish
> .
>
> .
> "Joan Hampton"  wrote in message
> news:778fa5cb.0203241751.52956de3@posting.google.com...
> > Sarah Brady did NOT break any gun laws - she didn't even come close.
> > The New York Daily News published a retraction on Saturday totally
> > taking the blame for their mistake.  Here's what they said:
> >
> > CORRECTION
> >
> > A story in some early editions of yesterday's Daily News incorrectly
> > reported that gun-control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted
> > Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but did
> > not declare who was going to own the weapon.
> >
> > The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to The News that
> > gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that
> > person's background could be checked. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the
> > Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and that
> > Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as long
> > as he was legally qualified to own a firearm. In addition, a spokesman
> > for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for
> > her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."
> >
> > The News regrets the error.
>
>




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----