05 Oct 15 16:20, you wrote to me:

 MK> Hey mark!

 ml>> You said "main link". I thought that meant your own node at 1:153/7001
 ml>> ?

 MK> See my last message to Holger Granholm where it says;

#1 *I* didn't write the above... wilfred did...

 MK> ======================================================================
 MK> From: Maurice Kinal
 MK> To: Holger Granholm
 MK> Subject: Re: strftime list
 MK> ======================================================================
 MK> ...
 MK> I haven't seen it that much.  My direct uplink uses "2015/10/03
 MK> 21:59:19
 MK> -8:00" which is "%Y/%m/%d %T %z" and is convertable as shown in the below
 MK> example;

 MK> :r !date --rfc-3339=seconds --date="2015/10/03 21:59:19 -8:00"

 MK> 2015-10-04 05:59:19+00:00
 MK> ...
 MK> ======================================================================

 MK> Although there is no indication in that message that the datetime stamp is
 MK> in error it is despite the fact that it all works.  I never use datetime
 MK> fidonet stamps as there is no acceptable standardization especially when
 MK> seeing obvious flaws such as demonstrated by the above datetime stamp.

you are not making any sense to me...

 MK> For the record it is generated by supposedly up to date binkp mailer.

binkd is a *mailer*... it doesn't know anything about messages or message
headers or message time stamps... it only sends files...

)\/(ark

... I thought about being Born Again, but my mother refused.
---