TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: dbridge
to: Benny Pedersen
from: Nick Andre
date: 2018-06-10 22:26:08
subject: Re: D`Bridge 3.99/SR32 released and avai

On 11 Jun 18  00:48:08, Benny Pedersen said the following to Roger Nelson:

BP>  RN> You still have X, Y, Z and a host of other options.  (-:
BP> 
BP> opensource is nice :)

A wise man told me "I'm afraid now this is a knee-jerk response in a way you
may not like to hear".

I am seriously so sick to death of what I believe is the good-majority of 
Linux techies having this unquestionable God-like devotion to that bum
and absolute horror of a human being, toenail-clipping-eating Richard
Stallman, GNU, "Free-is-best and commercial-software-be-damned" mentality.

For years as a Fido developer I have had the pleasure of receiving Echomail, 
Netmail and Internet email about why D'Bridge is not open source. And when I
state my logical reasons why, most of the time I am looked upon as an idiot
because I don't publish source code like Mystic, HPT and Synchronet.

All three of those programs are very nice, but have had the exact same 
problems as closed-source mailers, tossers, BBS software etc. If the code is 
open source, shouldn't there be such a huge crowd of people working to fix it?

For every Linux techie that told me over the years that open-source is more
trustworthy and secure and Windows is garbage... I ask them if they have
personally studied and reviewed the Linux kernal source. Nope. Have they
studied the code for Firefox? Nope. What about the code for all of your the
device drivers? Cue to the crickets chirping. So you have "to trust it".

Now I'm aware of the Windows-10 situation, telemetry, all of that... no I 
don't like it and no I do not run Windows 10.

But if Windows is such crap, how come its been many years now and Linux still
is not Desktop ready? Why is the focus on adding useless hated things like
SystemD, Selinux and Gnome 3?

If Microsoft is such a big bad evil corporation, does that mean that Apple, 
Google, Facebook and other open-source fanatical companies get a free pass?

I notice Linux techies seem to give their OS a free pass... CONSTANTLY. Even
with serious bugs and vulnerabilities like SSL, Heartbleed, the freaking
"beep" command insecurity... to say nothing about buggy device drivers.

Sorry Benny, I know you post in good fun, and I know I'm fair game but every
time I see another yay-for-open-source post its just... cringeworthy.

Nick

--- Renegade vY2Ka2
* Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 123/1970 153/736 154/10 203/0 124 221/0 1 6 360 229/393 426
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 400 266/404 280/464 5003 292/854 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 423/81 120 633/267 280 640/384 1384 712/620 848 770/1 2320/100 3828/7
@PATH: 229/426 280/464 203/0 221/1 6 0 640/1384 384 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.