| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | ATM Robo Vs. The Intereferometer |
From: "James Lerch" To: Cc: "ATM List" Reply-To: "James Lerch" Ok, Let the FUN begin For those that want "Just the Facts" here's everything I know at the moment: http://lerch.no-ip.com/atm/2ndTry/lerchtest1.ZIP (300KB from RF Royce) For reference, Mr. Royce indicated that at the 0 Degree starting position, Axis A was Up. Also the 10th order polynomials are on the way if we need them. For those that want just the reduced data with out opening a web browser. From the Quick Fringe Test Report: (with my math in {}) Unit = Waves Wavelength = 633nm RMS Wavefront = 0.145 {46nm Surface} PV wavefront = 0.67 {212nm Surface} Strehl Ratio = 0.44 Astigmatism = 0.40 83.3deg Spherical = -1.43 So, we have astigmatism. I imagine 0.4 is not a "good thing" Question, given what we now have, can we work backwards and calculate what Robo "should" have seen based on the interferometer data? Take Care, James Lerch http://lerch.no-ip.com/atm (My telescope construction,testing, and coating site) "Anything that can happen, will happen" -Stephen Pollock from: "Particle Physics for Non-Physicists: A Tour of the Microcosmos" --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.