In a message of 25 Sep 94 Roy McNeill wrote to me:

Hi Roy,

 RM> Hi Ray

 RM> I think I'd find this approach a bit less manageable. If I came back to
 RM> the project after a break, and wanted to #include another header file in
 RM> routine X, I'd have to hunt down the "master" file and
include it there.

The times I have resorted to this type of approach, the "master"
file has had the name of the completed project or object. The other files
being things like input.c etc. where the support files weren't large enough
to justify being compiled into individual objects, but are too large to
effectively maintain in the same file.

C++ makes life so much easier than to have to make decisions like this anyway...

Regards
         Ray

--- Spot 1.3 Unregistered