Kestrel wrote:

> There was a time when the sort of lightly grungy look was appealing, but now
> I tend to like well-groomed and businessy looking -- though the rugged
> outdoorsy type is good too, as long as they haven't been outdoors too long
> 

Oh, I don't like *dirty*. They have to bathe regularly. They just
don't have to shave--and if they prefer to grow their hair out
long, so much the better. :)
 
> > in the LoTR movies. (Though I wouldn't have any objection to
> > meeting Orlando Bloom, either. ;))
> 
> pretty boy 

He is that.

> not so into the pretty boys... though good humor, intense, intelligent,
> slightly brooding is good. Actually -- David Boreanaz of Buffy/Angel is
> *quite* nice... though still a tad too pretty, but he's got the wounded
> brooding look *perfect*... just makes me melt.

I don't watch the shows, but I think I know who you mean. Yes,
he's very nice. :) I don't go in for "pretty boys" either, as a
rule, but there was definitely Something about Legolas. Maybe it
was the hair....
 
> > 'Course, it was the Bad Boy look that got me into trouble a
> > couple of years ago....
> 
> yes, well... now you know why they're bad 

Well, yes. 
Though I think What's-His-Butt would have been just as much of a
twit if he'd been clean-shaven.
 
> > Lissa That'sOk,ILikeTheScruffyLook Wingling
> 
> Scruffy! Yes, I like scruffy :) But a cleanish sort of scruffy....

'Zactly. Aragorn after a bath.... Oooooooooo....

Lissa GoingBackToWatchItAgainToday Wingling

--- Rachel's Little NET2FIDO Gate v 0.9.9.8 Alpha