From: "Michael" 
@Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject: Re: W 10 mail contacts import
@Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:16:23 -0500
@Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
@Lines: 3
@Message-ID: 
@References: 
  
@Mime-Version: 1.0
@Content-Type: text/plain;
@        format=flowed;
@        charset="iso-8859-1";
@        reply-type=response
@Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
@Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 17:14:46 -0000 (UTC)
@Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f4b9ce02c68fda72d13˙
@ d3487a68bef2f";
@        logging-data="1482";
mail-complaints-to="abuse{at}eternal-september.org"˙
@ ;  posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Z4MWurds1L3NYcQS2R+q3"
@X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331
@In-Reply-To: 
@X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331
@Importance: Normal
@Cancel-Lock: sha1:XpGnyEbNUeTk4t4u3Fzc5tdoUfM=
@Xref: b4gate.uuhec.net alt.comp.os.windows-10:1930
 
 
 
"Paul"  wrote in message news:o4c4ot$kqp$1{at}dont-email.me...
 
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>> "Jim S"  wrote in message
>> news:12dgh7p3b5nc4$.1k11te72dptb9$.dlg{at}40tude.net...
>>
>> I have Outlook 2010, but quite like the way Windows 10 mail works. In
>> Outlook 2010 I have several folders of email addresses. W10 mail imports 
>> my
>> basic ontacts folder, but I would like to import the other folders
>> seperately from contacts. Is there a way?
>
> [SIGNATURE MARKER]
>
>> *************************************************************
>>
>> MS has turned a simple import, into a hair pulling torture.
>>
>> I don't use that POS, Mail.
>>
>> I use Windows Live Mail, and it works great.
>
> Well then I will give you a tip. Don't post UNDER the signature marker.
>
 
I think you're missing the rich irony here.
 
This is trademark behavior of WLM :-)
 
It does stuff like this for you.
 
WLM can be used for email. But for USENET,
using a separate application is recommended.
That's my suggestion. For one, these little
"signature accidents" won't happen.
 
You will notice WLM users trying to "fudge"
their usage of WLM, by top-posting. As that is
the easiest way to make it look like WLM is
somehow USENET-compatible. Then they'll give you
some story about "how they like to top-post",
when in fact all they're doing is hiding the
inadequacy of WLM for the job.
 
A rich tradition of irony, that WLM.
 
********************************************
 
 
Good thing you're not forced to use it.
 
 
 

--- ViaMAIL!/WC v2.00