======== Continued From Previous Message ==========

  tell others that they are "not logical",
270.  tell others that they are "not moral",
271.  refer to "phallocentric religions",
272.  refer to a "male only god",
273.  talk about "postors:,
274.  use "paucity" ad nauseam;
275.  Obsessed with word "Bitter Boy's",
276.  Always on about inflatable dolls,
277.  Has changed her name from hyerdahl1 to hyeddahl3 and then back to
hyerdahl,
278.  Says women dont need men in order to gestate,


Note-: original author unknown but please feel free to add to the list as i
have done
Or, reprint the whole list!  Feel free to suggest additions to the list; I
will post updates periodically.


"Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
news:1112020043.718726.211520{at}o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Philip Lewis wrote:
> > http://www.angryharry.com/
> >
> > Matrimony Trumps DNA He says he's the biological father, the but law
> says
> > matrimony trumps DNA.
>
> Well, I've always told you bitter boys that the presumption of
> paternity (as social contract) protects the man who has acted as the
> child's father, the man who is married to the mother.  Many bitter boys
> want to get rid of that presumption but here it protected the man who
> was willing to contract.  Good deal.]
>
> >
> > Blood boiling stuff.
> >
> > In summary: A woman gets pregnant with one man, but she leaves him
> and
> > marries another man before giving birth.
> >
> > And even though the first man is the father, he is denied access to
> the
> > child because she ditched him while she was pregnant - with his child
> - for
> > someone else!
> >
> > Indeed, he is not even deemed to be the father!
> >
> > As usual, the father counts for nothing.
>
> [The man who stepped up to the plate will be a better father than
> Johnny Spermalseed.]
> >
> > And, needless to say, the bogus mantra 'the best interests of the
> child' is
> > used by the corrupt judges to deny him any rights while kowtowing to
> the
> > whims of the woman.
>
> [The best interests of the child are hereby met.  Great!]
>
> >
> > In other words, the biological father counts for nothing in this
> particular
> > instance, but should this particular woman not have married someone
> else, he
> > would most certainly have been deemed to be the father, and he would
> have
> > been obligated to pay up.
>
> [Sperm shooters don't count for much, anyway.  Sperm is cheap.
> Contracting shows intent and purpose.  You DO want people to lead more
> "purposeful lives" do you not?  I mean isn't that what the moral
> majority wants?]
> >
> > This is equality, is it?
>
> [Yes.  A man can impregnate a woman he marries if he acts accordingly.]
> >
> > This is justice, is it?
> >
> [Yes, certainly, it is.]
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 12:46:37 PM ---