"kate" (kcourtesan{at}yahoo.com) writes:
>>Now, since you know *nothing* about the topic, and Ms. Sommers
>>*does*, that makes your opinion worth AbZero and Ms. Sommers'
>>a lot more.
>> Andre
>
> No mystery here. She "knows" about the subject because you agree with
> her opinion.

 I prefer to go with tested facts. Which Ms. Sommers
offered up in plentitude.

Further, for dissing her work, WITHOUT your having ever seen it,
you displayed the usual Feminist PREjudice. That makes your claim
equally worthless, as it's ABSENT of factual basis for it.

Too bad, so sad.

> "Saving Ophelia" says what you've already decided you
> don't agree with so the author's opinion is caca.

No proof offered ? Claim fails.

> There is nothing definitive about either author or their research.

No proof offered ? Claim fails.

> No doubt they both make excellent points.

Not according to the person who wrote:

" She 'knows' about the subject because you agree with her opinion. "

So, you claimed that her citations were " opinion ". Uh huh.

> But your fantacism blinds you to
> any possibility of altering your pre-convceived ideas about things.



> You are a bigot Andre.

Lets see, I offered a cited work that I've read and studied, and
"kate" offered... name calling.

Well, as bigots tend to be *ignorant*, and as the only person
so ignorant of the cited work is *you*, that means that, ipso
facto, *you are the bigot*.

Thanks for showing that you CANNOT debate/refute the topic.

Next !

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 8:46:45 PM ---