Philip Lewis wrote:
> http://www.angryharry.com/
>
> Matrimony Trumps DNA He says he's the biological father, the but law
says
> matrimony trumps DNA.
>
> Blood boiling stuff.
>
> In summary: A woman gets pregnant with one man, but she leaves him
and
> marries another man before giving birth.
>
> And even though the first man is the father, he is denied access to
the
> child because she ditched him while she was pregnant - with his child
- for
> someone else!
>
> Indeed, he is not even deemed to be the father!
>
> As usual, the father counts for nothing.
>
> And, needless to say, the bogus mantra 'the best interests of the
child' is
> used by the corrupt judges to deny him any rights while kowtowing to
the
> whims of the woman.

When they say "child," they mean teh adult female child, which is the
mother.

I often wonder if the best-interests ploy is just a way for some judges
and attorneys to escape the inherent difficulty of their jobs.  All
they have to do is say they are acting in the child's interests.  Then
they can say that the child's interests correspond to the mother's
interests.  Then they can just do whatever the mother wants.  Then they
can collect their big salaries with little mental effort.  Then they
can inspire a cheesy TV show like "Judging Amy," with the aim of
convincing us that it really is difficult to do what they do.

The best-interests standard is absurd, as one can use it to justify
anything.  I could knock off a Quick Mart, show that the robbery
benefitted some child, and some family court hack would set me free, if
he followed the standard that his court routinely uses.

[...]



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 8:46:44 PM ---