http://www.angryharry.com/

Matrimony Trumps DNA He says he's the biological father, the but law says
matrimony trumps DNA.

Blood boiling stuff.

In summary: A woman gets pregnant with one man, but she leaves him and
marries another man before giving birth.

And even though the first man is the father, he is denied access to the
child because she ditched him while she was pregnant - with his child - for
someone else!

Indeed, he is not even deemed to be the father!

As usual, the father counts for nothing.

And, needless to say, the bogus mantra 'the best interests of the child' is
used by the corrupt judges to deny him any rights while kowtowing to the
whims of the woman.

In other words, the biological father counts for nothing in this particular
instance, but should this particular woman not have married someone else, he
would most certainly have been deemed to be the father, and he would have
been obligated to pay up.

This is equality, is it?

This is justice, is it?

It is in the best interests of our children to allow women to cheat them out
of their real fathers, is it?

You western men reading this - of any creed or colour - should be ashamed
that you are not doing much more to fight these b#stards working in the
family courts.




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 8:46:35 AM ---