On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:17:07 -0500, Viking wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2005 06:12:58 -0800, "Hyerdahl"
 wrote:
>
>>Taking responsibility for being safe is not quite the same thing as
>>legal responsibility for rape.  Islamic bitter boy nut jobs will have
>>the same legal responsibility as anyone else who rapes.  Did you think
>>otherwise?
>
> Using the same logic you've been using in other posts today, anything
> can be justified on the basis of past "wrongs." So presumably, by your
> "logic," all they need to do is to point to the Crusades, and they
> can't be prosecuted.
>
> That your point on how women can do any crime and it's OK because of
> some putative past?



How far can she go back? Wasnt Eve the original sinner?



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 4:46:44 PM ---