>No, but neither do any of you feminists have proof that girls
>are educationally disadvantaged in the first place -- so don't
>give me any "logical fallacy" crap.  If you give more attention
>to girls, you must take it from somewhere.  There aren't that
>many trans-genders, so it has to be taken away from boys.  There
>ain't nobody else.

Logically, it does not follow that simply making educators aware of
problems girls have in the public educational system is going to
axiomatically deprive boys of attention. Neither does it harm girls
when educators are informed on problems affecting boys.
Your hysterical ravings aside, you are not operating from a logical
position. Perhaps if you were less emotional?

Kate



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 4:46:44 PM ---