Hyerdahl wrote:
> Philip Lewis wrote:
>
>>http://www.angryharry.com/
>>
>>Matrimony Trumps DNA He says he's the biological father, the but law
>
> says
>
>>matrimony trumps DNA.
>
>
> Well, I've always told you bitter boys that the presumption of
> paternity (as social contract) protects the man who has acted as the
> child's father, the man who is married to the mother.  Many bitter boys
> want to get rid of that presumption but here it protected the man who
> was willing to contract.  Good deal.]
>
No. Not a good deal bad deal or anything else deal.

As the article goes on to point out; had the
female concerned not married the biological
fatrher would suddenly have been deemed the
father and - no doubt - been told to pay pay [ay.

And Hymendung would have telling us all the he
should be made to face up to his responsibilities.

but here......
>
>>Blood boiling stuff.
>>
>>In summary: A woman gets pregnant with one man, but she leaves him
>
> and
>
>>marries another man before giving birth.
>>
>>And even though the first man is the father, he is denied access to
>
> the
>
>>child because she ditched him while she was pregnant - with his child
>
> - for
>
>>someone else!
>>
>>Indeed, he is not even deemed to be the father!
>>
>>As usual, the father counts for nothing.
>
>
> [The man who stepped up to the plate will be a better father than
> Johnny Spermalseed.]
>
>>And, needless to say, the bogus mantra 'the best interests of the
>
> child' is
>
>>used by the corrupt judges to deny him any rights while kowtowing to
>
> the
>
>>whims of the woman.
>
>
> [The best interests of the child are hereby met.  Great!]
>
>
>>In other words, the biological father counts for nothing in this
>
> particular
>
>>instance, but should this particular woman not have married someone
>
> else, he
>
>>would most certainly have been deemed to be the father, and he would
>
> have
>
>>been obligated to pay up.
>
>
> [Sperm shooters don't count for much, anyway.  Sperm is cheap.
> Contracting shows intent and purpose.  You DO want people to lead more
> "purposeful lives" do you not?  I mean isn't that what the moral
> majority wants?]
>
Suddenly Hymendung wants to say that sperm is
cheap and that intent is what matters. So if a
guy never had any intent to pay, pay, pay - no
doubt Hymendung would agree that he should not
be made to.

Let's see how the dreaded 1% gets on with this
one!!!

D.
>>This is equality, is it?
>
>
> [Yes.  A man can impregnate a woman he marries if he acts accordingly.]
>
>>This is justice, is it?
>>
>
> [Yes, certainly, it is.]
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 4:46:43 PM ---