Again, Good! I'm very glad to know the rules. This definitely looks like
the place for me. However... my daughter's case differs some. That is, I
gather that the majority of false accusations are about molestation. Ours is
not. It's murder. I'll tell it briefly: My daughter had a baby, was
delighted, in love with her baby. Not married to the father, but living
with. That last week of baby's life, a friend lived w/them during the winter
of '93--one of the harshest on record. Basement apt. She nursed, was
concerned over colic problem, calling La Leche (breastfeeding) League for
help. Took herbs, thinking her milk was causing colic. Unknown to her and
to the friend staying with them, the father was tripping on acid and hurting
the baby. It was extremely frigid in the basement apt. How cold? When I'd
stayed there (after the tragedy), I contracted pneumonia. A few days later,
when my husband arrived, he got pneumonia too. She stopped bathing baby, for
he seemed to have a cold. The father insisted on taking over all diaper &
clothes changing. He abused in secret. The friend wanted to testify. The DA
flew him in especially to testify, but after he kept insisting he was there &
also saw nothing, she dropped him. My daughter's attorneys were highly
negligent. They did not use an investigator even though the court agreed to
pay for one. They refused to use the friend as witness, claiming the DA would
discredit him. The DA put on a show that rivaled Marcia Clark's or Johnnie
Cochran's--plus she lied. On one occasion, there was even improper contact
w/the jury. Yes, these are appeal issues, and they were argued. We do
believe she will have her case overturned. But if any part remains, we will
have to fight it. Moreover, we need to address the issue of prosecutorial
abuse. It must not be right to lie in court. My daughter knew absolutely
nothing of the abuse, and anyone who sees the video of her police interview
can readily see it. Those who are exposed to her _whole_ story can see
exactly how wrong the prosecution was. It was widely known among the local
legal community that her prosecutor was using my daughter to get re-elected.
In fact, the man who is now the new DA (defeating the one who did damage to
us and many others), was going to testify for my daughter, but the former DA
got the judge to rule that attorney-client privilege. Just some facts. You
said not to hide, but to be open. I've been that, and trust that I've been
appropriate. We're grateful for your conference. Only blessings from this
end.
--- Maximus 2.01wb
---------------
* Origin: Library COM -* Reno, NV USA *- (702) 785-4191 (1:213/742)
|