Robert Plett wrote in a message to Justin Baustert:
JB>Starting with the last "it":  I didn't mean to make it sound like I was
JB>referring to the Constitution, though it definitely could be mistaken for
JB>that.  By "it", I was referring to the usual wait-time any action gets put
JB>upon it by Congress.
 RP> As I pointed out to you at the very outset, Justin, even if the
 RP> "it" does refer to Congress, when you spoke of going around it (the
 RP> Congress), you *still* spoke in praise of the circumvention of the
 RP> Constitution.  There simply isn't any way to escape that, as it is
 RP> the Constitution that delegates to Congress those powers and
 RP> authority you spoke in praise of having found a way to go around.
 RP> Either way one slices it, your statement reveals a contempt for
 RP> Constitutional authority that is the very same as one sees only in
 RP> liberal/socialists anytime that document gets in their way.
Just a thought here, Robert.  Is Justin really showing a contempt for 
Constitutional authority?  I'm not sure, but it could be a way to force 
Congress to act w/o endless committees and commissions that spend money and 
accomplish nothing useful.  If (the proposed action) is the right thing to 
do, that kind of circumvention doesn't sound so bad.
-- Mark
--- FMailX32 1.22
---------------