RB> I can't recall the supreme court of ever hearing a 2nd amendment case.
The Miller case was argued on those grounds, and the Supremes based their
ruling on the plaintiff's failure to demonstrate that a sawed-off shotgun
is an ordinary infantry weapon. Had he done so (for which he presumably
would have had to show up) his individual right to possess one would
likely have been upheld.
... There is no hiding from a verbal shotgun.
--- FMail 1.22
---------------
* Origin: CyberSupport Hq/Co.A PRN/SURV/FIDO+ (602)231-9377 (1:114/428)
|