| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | phone number standard |
AWL> Any ideas on 3-2-4 v. 3-3-3 numbers ie 076-39-2379 076-392-379? db> Not really .. I've seen them often used inter-changeably (some UWS db> Nepean literature uses 3-2-4, others use 3-3-3). AWL> I find the xx-xxxx form more asthetic. Yeah, I do too, not sure why tho, you would expect the balanced set would be. AWL> xxx-xxx is closer to the actual implementation of exchanges... Nope, xx-xxxx is. And its all academic now anyway as the new phone numbering scheme adds another digit. That will favor the xx-xxxx-xxxx style, and is a fucked abortion coz its the reverse of what the US uses. --- PQWK202* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 690/718 711/809 934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.