RC>>> He is calling into question a talking head crying on

 BK>>  He is calling into question a commentator, who is believed by
 BK>>  millions.

 RC> and you and Sauer must rescue these millions, what makes
 RC> either of you correct then?

 I am correct.

 If you don't believe you are correct then you must be lying, by
 definition.

 I stand by the beliefs of the largest single faith in the world,
 and the time tested principles it teaches.

 What do you stand by?

 RC> You do know that if the shoe was on the other foot, you and
 RC> I would not be having this conversation?

 If the shoe was on the other foot you would be on my side, so
 you would be correct.

 RC>>> Either way, what talking heads do on camera is
 RC>>> entertainment..

 BK>>  No, it is not. It is propaganda. The republican party is owned
 BK>>  by Fox News now. And they have no investment in the freedom or
 BK>>  success of this country.

 RC> Then the Democrats are co-owned by CNN, MSNBC and Soros??

 When any such "News Organization" puts a significant number of
 expected 2012 candidates for the democratic presidential
 nomination on their payroll, ask about that again.

 Last I heard, the only likely republican 2012 presidential
 contender not on Fox News' payroll is Mitt Romney.

 RC>>> I remind you again that you lefties have yet to distinguish
 RC>>> the difference between reporting the news and commentary on
 RC>>> it..

 BK>>  We know it, except that the difference doesn't much exist on Fox
 BK>>  News.

 RC> Then keep your TV tuned elsewhere, where is the problem
 RC> here?

 And when the Nazi supporters, before they took power, said, "If
 you don't agree with Hitler tune your radio to another station."
 they did. And they were unaware of the danger until the death
 knell sounded.

 Now the right emulates the Nazis, all the while calling those
 who disagree with them Nazis.

 RC> Oh wait, rhetorical, you want to rescue these people to
 RC> only have your ideology?

 As do you, unless you don't believe in what you say. The
 difference being, I support their right to disagree, without
 calling them evil. The ones who are determined to take power at
 any cost are truly evil, though.

 BK>>  If you do not stand against evil it will change you.

 RC> I do stand up to evil, I stand up against your kind.

 You admit you stand with evil.

 RC>>> is what your kind strives for, after all isnt it true that
 RC>>> you people think you know what is best for everyone?

 BK>>  You think so. So what? Does that mean you want to repeal the
 BK>>  constitution?

 RC> No, your kind does.

 The constitution supports what I believe in. Freedom of
 religion, and freedom from religion.

 Freedom to disagree with you is a constitional right, one you
 would do away with.

 I have never said disagreeing with me is evil, you have repeated
 it in this and other msgs in this packet.



BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... peto verum fidens vel ventus
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]