| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | borland C++ for OS/2 |
> ac> int main(void) > I have only started programming in C so I haven't used that can you > tell me the advantages of that compared to "void main()" "void main()" does not conform with the ISO standard. Put simply, it still 'works' with most (all?) compilers, but there is no guarantee that any conforming implementation need do so or will. "void main()" is often used in books which were written prior 1989 (when ANSI-C became standard) or written by folks who learned C before 1989. Using "void main()" is regarded as poor practice to do so, but not as bad as a zillion other things you can do wrong, such as writing code whose result depends on the order of evaluation of arguments in an expression etc. --- Squish/386 v1.11* Origin: Decadence BBS: It's a way of life ! (3:632/103) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/54 620/243 623/630 624/50 632/103 301 348 386 998 633/371 SEEN-BY: 633/379 634/384 635/301 502 503 541 544 636/100 639/100 711/401 409 SEEN-BY: 711/410 430 510 807 808 809 932 934 942 712/623 713/888 714/906 SEEN-BY: 800/1 @PATH: 632/103 348 635/503 50/99 54/54 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.