-=> JOHN MASSEY wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-

 WC>> None of the injuries I sustained would have been helped in the least
 WC>> by running to a hospital.

 JM>> How did you determan that?

 WC> You first.
 WC> You're the long range dianostician without a clue.

 JM> Your stroke must have affected your reading comprehension.

Well I'm not the one that spelled determined "determan"
as you did above.

In case my reading comprehension is yet again askew
what's a "determan?" 

 JM> I made no such diagnosis, I asked you how you knew, with out any
 JM> medical diagnosis being done, you knew?

 WC>> The spinal injury is permanent and unfixable.

 JM>> Not according to some. The TV show Extreme Home Makeover last night
 JM> did

 WC> They told you on TV, well then it must be true.

 JM> No the show had a segment where people that had been diginosed as
 JM> "never will walk again" were in fact standing an walking.

 Geez, how silly of me to consult medical board cerified
 orthopedic surgeons when I've the television at my disposal.

 JM>> Besides it could have been temporarry paralisis from nerve
 JM> compression
 JM>> caused buy impact swelling.                ^y

 Uh, who said anything about paralysis?

 I did have some paralysis recently however that was on the right side 
 of my face.

 WC>> Any of you Harvard Medical school graduates have anything to add?

 JM>> Well I didn't get that particular degree but even without it  I
 JM> think
 JM>> only a fool would have sustained as much damage in an accident as
 JM> you
 JM>> claim to have and not seek ANY medical treatment.

 WC> You've not addressed my point the condition is permanent and
 WC> not fixable.

 JM> You haven't proven your claim that all Spinal cord ingeries are
 JM> permanent and not fixable.

 You've not yet presented your medical credentials.

 JM> I on the other hand  have offered evidence that there is always hope
 JM> with work and a positive aditude.

 What's "aditude"
 My reading comprehension must be on the fritz again. 

 JM>> Your claim that the police refused medical treatment is simply not
 JM>> believable.
 JM>> ..

 WC> Except for the few nagging details of it having been published in both the
 WC> Saint Petersburg Times and the Tampa Tribune.

 JM> I would love to see that.  About when was your story in these papers?
 
did I say it was "my" story, I think not however 8 other people 
*died* that same year from medical inattention by hte same medical service
for trivial offenses.

You'd love to see that eh?
Well just google for it as there are hundreds of newspaper accounts
of similar instances from all over the United States.

Perhaps you've more time than I for such pursuits?

 JM> I have contacts in Tampa that I could get to go to the archives and
 JM> look them up.

Look what up?
The idea that it was my account coverd in the newspaper?
Don't look for it as that BS you dreamt up.
I simply became sensitive to people being injured and killed
under similar circumstances.

Michelle died at the ripe old age of 17 for drunk and disorderly.
Found dead and cold in a cell the next morning.
It would have been a small civil ordinance fine had she lived. 

 WC> They then went to Hillsborough county jail system and offed
 WC> a few more misdomeaner offenders.

 WC> I can probably look up the name in the newspaper archives
 WC> but you'd have some excuse why it's a lie.

 JM> Please do.

I did look briefly however as I say too many accounts of similar
to dig through just for the name of the medical services provider
or more accurately non-provider.

 JM> I didn't say it was a lie. I said it was totally unbelievable.
 
Google for it, plenty of other examples of the same.

I just installed Linux Slackware 10.2 on my second physical hard drive
as a safety backup.
What constructive task have you been at other than the keyboard _thinking_
up or more accurately "mind reading" things you *know* that happened
dispite not having any knowledge of facts or circumstances.

Are you the smartest one in this group John? 

 
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.47