WC> WC>Separating hydrogen currently takes more energy
WC> WC>than provided by that hydrogen separated unless
WC> WC>using fossil fuel methods
WC> WC>which solves nothing

WC> JB> And yet the fools on the left foist this myth onto the public as
WC> JB> being a cheap, reliable, and safe replacement for petroleum.
WC> JB> None of which is true.

WC>See post graduate fellow research work Massachussetts
WC>Institute of Technology located in Cambridge Massachussetts.

WC>Work in progress includes research aimed at devising synthetic
WC>analog to reproduce low energy means employed by
WC>plants using photosynthesis to separate  O2 and H2
WC>from strong molecular bond existing in water.

WC>As you know both hydrogen and oxygen exist as diatomic
WC>molecules at normal standard temperature and pressure
WC>in the normal ambient environment.

WC>Let me take the time to extend our appreciation
WC>for your participation in the Wayne Chirnside rehabilitation efforts.

This is a myth.


WC>In closing: What do you think the result from the anticipated
WC>Europian heavy collider partical experiment
WC>might be?

WC>Personally I believe a wealth of data shall be yielded.
WC>I myself put aside concerns of interdemensional breakdown
WC>leading to generated microscopic black hole swallowing the
WC>Earth.

WC>As you undoubtably know this experiment is designed to investigate
WC>the properties of the heretofore as yet unknown
WC>but postulated Higgs Boson.

WC>Inquiring minds wish for you to offer your
WC>opinion upon this cutting edge subatomic particle physics experiment.

I want you to explain what this has to do with the discussion at hand.
Now if you are attempting to say it will prove that the molecular makeup
of a gas is able to store more energy that the molecular makeup of a
liquid, then we might have something rational to discuss but you'd be wrong.


Jeff

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10