PE> The known problem with PQWK221 is not inter zone netmail,
PE> that works fine.

RS> Yeah, I meant 2.02, whoopy do.  Will now rephrase my response
RS> to your top para. I am not using 2.21, so I dont give a stuff
RS> about its deficiencys.

PE> You were saying that Frank had good reason to not upgrade,

Nope I was saying that *I* had a good reason not to upgrade that
had to do with thorough testing of what *I* was upgrading to.

PE> when there is no good reason for him to not upgrade.

Thats crap too. You just dont know what bugs might be lurking.
No one can. That software Paul. You know that as well as I do
and the THREE bugs that have slipped thru the testing so far
shows that it aint just an academic possibility.

PE> PQWK222 has no short-term problems, as Brenton has verified.

And there is just a tad more to life than short term problems.

PE> And 221 is just as likely to have long-term problems as 222.

Which might just explain why I dont use 221.

--- PQWK202