Hello Tommi,

On 18 Nov 16 11:24, Tommi Koivula wrote to Ignatius:

 TK> @MSGID: 2:221/6.0 582ec8ba
 TK> @REPLY: 1:340/800.0 582e9af5
 TK> @REPLYADDR tommi@rbb.bbs.fi
 TK> @PID: JamNNTPd/Win32 1.2.3
 TK> @CHRS: IBMPC 2
 TK> @TZUTC: 0200
 >> From: "Ignatius -> All" 
 >> X-Comment-To: All
 >> Newsgroups: fidotest
 >> Subject: Again..
 >> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2252 10:56:32 GMT

 TK> Cool! :D

 >> Message-ID: 
 >> X-JAM-From: Ignatius
 >> X-JAM-To: All
 >> X-JAM-MSGID: 1:340/800.0 582e9af5
 >> X-JAM-PID: Imp-Mail 2.01
 >> X-JAM-FTSKLUDGE: TID: hpt/dpmi-djgpp 1.9.0-cur 24-06-16
 >> X-JAM-SEENBY2D: 123/500 129/215 154/10 30 700 203/0 221/6 227/201
 >> 229/310 280/464
 >> X-JAM-SEENBY2D: 340/800
 >> X-JAM-PATH2D: 340/800 154/10
 >> X-JAM-Attributes: TypeEcho
 >> MIME-Version: 1.0
 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 >>
 >> Again.. Sorry for the spam, people.

 TK> This is fidotest, spam allowed.

So the timestamp showed correctly in your newsreader yet the same message
showed a bad date here? It passed only through my system before it got to you,
and I don't run any time altering software here. Only hpt processes it and
sends it on.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827