| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Obama`s Report Card |
Jeff Snyder -> Ross Cassell wrote: JS> Hello again Ross. You made some interesting points, but I still tend to JS> think that regardless of which system is used, EC or DPV, there are always JS> going to be winners and losers. Lets hope so. JS> Earlier, you mentioned the issue of political apathy, and contended that it JS> would be worse if we switched over to a Direct Popular Vote, because the JS> larger populated states would trounce the smaller states every time. While JS> that may possibly be true, is it really any different now? JS> What I mean by that is that even now there is a great deal of political JS> apathy in the USA. Why? Because after decades of seeing nothing really change, JS> and in fact, only grow worse, a lot of people have given up and think to JS> themselves "Why even vote? My vote means nothing. The rich and the powerful will JS> put into office whoever they want, regardless of what I think, or who I want." JS> As I said earlier, it is always Big Money that wins the election, and with JS> Obama we have seen it again. I was amazed, but pleased, to see Obama JS> destroy the Clinton political machine. He hasn't done any such thing. It was akin to a political miracle, and JS> it goes to show how with the right powerful, elite backers behind him, even a JS> person who was a nobody four years ago, can become US president if he or she is JS> willing to play the game, and have their strings pulled. JS> In short, we have apathy now because of the grip of the elite and the JS> powerful, and we would also have some apathy then, if the large states kept JS> trouncing the smaller ones. JS> But, there is one important difference: Even if there were to be some JS> apathy under a DPV system, at least we would know that a president won an JS> election by the true consent of the people, and that each and every vote truly JS> counted and was worth something. Why do you think that? If people believe that Votes are not counted now what makes you think they will be more accurately counted just because there is direct election? --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 18/200 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 236/150 SEEN-BY: 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1410 1418 266/1413 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 633/260 267 712/848 800/432 2222/700 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 123/789 500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.