From: "Adam Flinton" 

I can see eclipse being "disruptive" in that way. I know / know
of a large & growing set of "free" projects bringing all
sorts of stuff to eclipse...in fact so much so that....buying expensive
tools???.....I reckon the days of the 3k USD/UKœ IDE are drawing to an end
as are the days of even the 1K IDE.

I've been playing around with the plugins/SWT for about a month & a 1/2 now
& I must say that......actually the scope of Eclipse is much much wider that
just an IDE. You could make a fast & good cross platform Word processor
/set of office tools etc within eclipse.

have a look round:

http://eclipse-plugins.2y.net/eclipse/index.jsp


Adam


"Tim Hawkins"  wrote in message
news:3e223c96$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Thanks, I'll look at it, Im also looking at CodeForge, and the Metroworks
> CodeWarrior, but they both cost money :-)
>
>
> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
> news:3e214f9d{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Eclipse......?
> >
> > Works on both. I have a friend who likes C & C++ etc &
he's just started
> > using the C/C++ plugin for eclipse & quite likes it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > "Tim Hawkins"  wrote in message
> > news:3e20d7f8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > I had much the same problem after installing the new version of Ximian
> > > Evolution, it updated all the
> > > bonobo libs and half my apps stopped working.
> > >
> > > Does anybody know of a decent Developer IDE, both Kdevelop and Anjuta
> are
> > > seriously unstable,
> > > I find it easier to go back to windows, build apps under visual studio
> and
> > > then port the source across
> > > and compile on the linux box.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gregg Nemesure"  wrote in message
news:3e16222f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > > I have a Redhat 7.2 development system that has had some of its
> > libraries
> > > > and gcc updated both through up2date and manually through rpm.
> > > > Unfortunately, attempting to execute the compiled software on an
> > > unmodified
> > > > system causes a load error because the correct version of glibc
cannot
> > be
> > > > found there.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to install multiple versions of glibc
and associiated
> > > headers
> > > > on the development system so I can pick which one I am targeting?
> > > >
> > > > Doing rpm -qa | grep glibc on the development system gives me:
> > > >
> > > >     glibc-common-2.2.93-5
> > > >     glibc-2.2.93-5
> > > >     glibc-devel-2.2.93-5
> > > >
> > > > The target system has
> > > >
> > > >    glibc-profile-2.2.4-29
> > > >    glibc-2.2.4-29
> > > >    glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
> > > >    glibc-common-2.2.4-29
> > > >
> > > > Would installing an older version of glibc-devel do the
trick? Also,
> why
> > > > does the updated system no longer have glibc-profile? I
don't know
> what
> > > this
> > > > is.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Gregg
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4