Remember this line from my original post?

~>  EC> On 2/22/2009 11:54 AM, bob klahn wrote to ALL:

Klahn chopped it out and pretended it wasn't there.  I pointed that fact out:

~>  EC> [Klahn carefully cut that part out, in an effort to change
~>  EC> the context of the part he DIDN'T cut out]

And in his new response he AGAIN chopped out the line, while quoting the
part that made REFERENCE to it!

And then he makes this meaningless accusation:
 
~>  Earl practices what I call "Republican editing."

Same old pattern.  Klahn makes baseless accusations that other people are
doing something, to try to cover the FACT that he has been shown guilty of
the very same thing.

And then he rambled on in his usual unoriginal way, trying to borrow ideas
and phrases from others since he cannot come up with his own.  Nothing new
there either.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a