Hello Nick.

21 Aug 07 03:24, you wrote to me:


 NV>>> My mistake, fixed. Please, try code from cvs.
 RT>> Thanks, just tried it and it compiles fine ...

 NV> Fine.



 NV>>> btw, rc5 is outdated. Please, don't use it.
 RT>> Well if cvs does not work, I have no choice but to fall back to
 RT>> the last version that worked, (rc5) and if that does not work,
 RT>> then I am right royally screwed ... 

 NV> It's common that in the cvs version some minor issues exist,
 NV> especially with compiling on various linuxes. But most of the time
 NV> they are really easy to solve, we just need some quality feedback and
 NV> things will be up and running again in no time. So, I would add "make
 NV> report and wait a day or two" somewhere in between "does
not work" and
 NV> "be royally screwed" in your algorithm =)

Heeee ... heeee .... hic-cup .... 

Such things happen time to time, and I really do appreciate your speedy 
response, but when I need to test something, it must work immiediately, for 
the simple reason, I don't have time to hang around and wait. i.e. when I try 
and test something, and it does not work, well, it might be weeks or months 
later before I have the freedom/ability to take up that task again.

So once again, many thanks for the "fix"

Enjoy!!

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5