*** Quoting Lance Leonard to Rob Green dated 01-28-95 ***
>  RG> I recently upgraded to PFW 5.0 from the first window's 
>  RG> version, and have had trouble with the conversion.  The 
>  RG> First Problem is with windows for workgroups, it ran 
>  RG> fine before, but since the upgrade, having two users 
>  RG> access pfw at the same time knocks them both out.  The 
>  RG> idapi pointer seems to be fine. Any ideas?
> 
> First, I'd make sure that a) both user have unique user names, b) both 
> users are using the same .NET file, and c) that both users have rights 
> to the target directory _and_ are using separate private directories.
>  
> Next, I'd look at the configuration.  First, make sure you're not using
> 32-bit file access; it's broken--period.  Also, see whether or not 
> you're using VSHARE (as opposed to SHARE).  If you are, then make sure 
> you've set the Windows component of SMARTDRV to be no higher than 
> 128KB.  (again, there are problems.)
>  
> If these don't help, get ahold of the TI's that Tech has on WFWG.  
> There's about three or four (if memory serves) and they outline 
> configuration tips and so forth.  
 
Done all that.  But thanks.
 
*** Quoting Lance Leonard to Rob Green dated 01-28-95 ***
>  RG> The Second Problem is regarding reports.  I changed the tables to 
> 5.0, 
>  RG> and then designed a new report. The report works fine
>  RG> until I deliver it.
>  RG> ...but then an error message comes up that 
>  RG> says something like 'the version of objectpal used is 
>  RG> from a previous version, this form must be recompiled 
>  RG> from source.'
> 
> Check to make sure that there aren't any extra copies of the report 
> floating around--perhaps in the private directory or some other source 
> directory.  Also, make sure that the delivered version in the directory
> that you're using is compiled from a _saved_ report design, e.g. one 
> that you've explicitly saved in 5.0.  (That shouldn't make much 
> difference, but there are differences in the file format between 4.5 
> and 5.0, so it may help.
>  
Your reply was appreciated.  We've tried looking for something leftover from 
the previous version.  Alas...
 
However, we're going to start on a developement machine... that's not on that 
network.
 
Thanks!
--- GEcho 1.00
---------------