Hello Wilfred,

On 17 Nov 16 16:21, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> And after verifying, 712/848 is Scott Little, who is definitely
 NB>> not a Mystic system. So in the path it took to get to you, there
 NB>> are no Mystic systems, yet the seconds were still apparantly
 NB>> dropped off.

 WV> Date/time and path of first to arrive here:

 WV> 2016-11-17 02:19:15
 WV> @PATH: 340/800 154/10 123/500 140/1 120/544 227/51

 WV> Second (dupe):

 WV> 2016-11-17 02:31:00
 WV> @PATH: 340/800 154/10 221/6 0 140/1 261/38 712/848

 WV> So the date/time was changed in both paths, but on different systems,
 WV> or at different times, because 140/1 is in there twice and didn't
 WV> recognise it as dupe. And on the second path it might have had its
 WV> seconds removed later by a mystic system... But this is all irrelevant
 WV> ;), because the problem is the original date/time stamp...

I've confirmed there are no Mystic systems in either of those paths. So it
seems some other software out there is doing the same thing (dropping seconds
off the timestamp), according to your dupe.

As you said, though.. It wouldn't have had to be changed at all in the first
place (although it still shouldn't have been) had the original system had a
proper timestamp.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827