From: "Robert Comer" 

> This is true of course, but mostly irrelevant for client side
"business"
> applications, whose need for processor speed was surpassed by the hardware
> long, as Intel belatedly realized.

I still need it -- big time too.  Multitasking response, not raw single
tasking cycles, laptops are WAY to slow for me.  (any I've tried anyway)

> So I appreciate the extra speed when I'm doing audio editing at home on my
> desktop, but I  don't give two hoots about between 9 and 5.

I need more processing power at work than at home and I do video stuff at home.

--
Bob Comer


"Dave Ings"  wrote in message
news:43f08c91$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> This is true of course, but mostly irrelevant for client side
"business"
> applications, whose need for processor speed was surpassed by the hardware
> long, as Intel belatedly realized.
>
> So I appreciate the extra speed when I'm doing audio editing at home on my
> desktop, but I  don't give two hoots about between 9 and 5.
> --
> Regards,
> Dave Ings,
> Toronto, Canada
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:43f08a29
>>
>> Raw performance and cost, desktops are still quite a bit faster,
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5