"Dustin"  wrote in message 
news:XnsA35EC6BD94998C9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@94.75.214.90...
>
>"Buffalo"  wrote in
>news:lp1t9l$6s4$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Since there is basically no cpu usage by any of the above while not on
>> the Internet, I will not try an uninstall and install of MBAM until I
>> get a fresh copy of ver 1.75. I'm in no rush since the high memory usage
>> doesn't seem to effect my system, Win7HE 64bit 8GB ram.
>> Have a fun 4th.
>
>You can snag a clean v1.75 here:
>
>http://filehippo.com/download_malwarebytes_anti_malware/14815/
>
>
>
Thanks for the link;
In case you missed my last replay on heavy MBAM memory usage, here it is 
again:

">Still, a tremendous difference.
>My mbamscheduler.exe *32   107MB  compared to your reading of 4KB
>mbamservice.exe *32  254MB  compared to your reading of 67KB
>
>I don't understand why!!  :("



Well, now I do. Dumb me.  :(
I was reading the Peak Working Set (Memory) values in Task Manager and not
the Memory (Private Working Set) numbers.
Now my readings are comparable to FredW's reading.
Time for a beer, ice cold with the glass frosted.  :)
Have a happy 4th.
-- 
Buffalo 

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2