TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: windows
to: All
from: Ken{at}invalid.news.com
date: 2017-01-02 12:14:34
subject: Re: W 10 mail contacts import

From: Ken Blake 
@Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject: Re: W 10 mail contacts import
@Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:14:34 -0700
@Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
@Lines: 13
@Message-ID: 
@References: 
 

@Mime-Version: 1.0
@Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
@Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
@Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="339c0aa4100688f085a˙
@ 305ca7a86b0b7";
@        logging-data="14515";
mail-complaints-to="abuse{at}eternal-september.org˙
@ "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Qt0sGBslACutPP05uTjDUZZKOFMHyJ0k="
@X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
@Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fwlg6U4jz0sMEG3Os3EbGvSMqls=
@Xref: b4gate.uuhec.net alt.comp.os.windows-10:1933
 
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 00:12:13 +0000, Jim S  wrote:
 
 
>I would have said Live Mail is no better than Outlook 2010: is it?
 
 
 
As much as I dislike Windows Live Mail, if you're talking about
newsreaders, Windows Live Mail is *much* better than Outlook 2010; No
version of Outlook has ever had newsreading capability.
 
If you're talking about e-mail clients, as far as I'm concerned, any
version of Outlook is much better than Windows Live Mail.

--- ViaMAIL!/WC v2.00
* Origin: ViaMAIL! - Lightning Fast Mailer for Wildcat! (1:261/20)
SEEN-BY: 34/999 90/1 116/18 120/302 123/500 128/187 140/1 218/700 222/2
SEEN-BY: 230/150 240/1120 249/303 250/1 261/38 100 266/404 267/155 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/1027 282/1031 1056 292/907 908 320/119 219 340/400 393/68 396/45
SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 640/384 712/620 848 770/1 801/161 189 2320/100 105
@PATH: 261/20 116/18 261/38 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.