Hello Maurice!
29 Mar 15 17:54, you wrote to me:
MK> Excellent! Also looks good here once converted from latin1 to utf8 in
MK> both the post as well as the quote in your reply. The only problem is
MK> that it only works for latin1 characters when posting from the BBS. It
MK> would be best if it was utf8.
If bit had been in UTF8 I would have returned a bunch of rubbish. ;)
On the other hand I would still have lloked nice on the utillity I am not
developing. :)
MK> On the plus side at least it isn't some
MK> bogus character set like ibmpc. :::evil grin:::
I don't mind about ibmpc as it caters to old software that has no knowledge
of the CHARSET kludge.
I do mind about people setting CHARSET: latin-9 in the header and using ibmpc
in the message.
Charset guessing gives a better result, as following the CHARSET kludge at
the cost of (free) cpu cycles.
Kees
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
|