On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:14:14 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 17/08/2019 15:57, Bud Spencer wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>> Not according to medical research
>>
>> Reading the wrong research then? There is so many peer reviewed
>> "research" and "study" out there that has nothing to do with reality.
>> But that's academia for you.
>>
>> Anyway. This is off-topic, but say this much,  sugars are the worst and
>> fructose and such nastyness in fruits is the worst of the sugars, so
>> it's kinda no brainer.
>>
>>
> No. According to research starch, which converts directly to glucose, is
> way nastier tha fructose.
>
> Bread  is the worst form of starch as well.
> And is nearly ALL starch.
>
> Fruits - even tropical fruits - have far more roughage vitamins and
> water than they do sugars
>
>
>
>> Keep up the good heatlh anyway!
>
> Bit late for that


As a type 2 diabetic who has spent a considerable time monitoring my
blood glucose levels I can confirm that starches do indeed raise your BG
levels considerably & for a prolonged period
white bread is definitely the worst offender.
Although fruits do have a varying amounts of sugar (grapes are considered
Sugar bombs by most diabetics they do at least contain nutrients &
vitamins. also if high in fibre the slow down the absorption of sugar
causing less of a spike. Apples & strawberries are surprisingly good in
this respect


--
 no BSD fans ?
 Elric: it's hard to be a gamer and a bsd fan :p

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05