From: "Robert Comer" 



- Bob Comer


"Joe Barr"  wrote in message
news:3e379e12{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> Did he say false premise or false promise?
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 03:08:50 +0000, Robert Comer wrote:
>
> > What false premise?
> >
> > - Bob Comer
> >
> >
> >   "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e378899$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >      The first problem with George's rant is that it is based on a false
> >      premise.
> >
> >   Rich
> >
> >     "Antti Kurenniemi"
 wrote in message
> >     news:3e3762ee{at}w3.nls.net... That really sounds likea a good idea.
> >     Unfortunately I think it will probably never happen :-(
> >
> >
> >     Antti Kurenniemi
> >
> >     "Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e374ea7{at}w3.nls.net...
> >     > yes I read all about it. It occurs to me that a big part of the
> >     > problem with how they are dealing with this problem is actually
> >     > related to copy protection. One of the things that causes all
these
> >     > unpatched machines to continuously be available is that people are
> >     > always doing new installs/re-installs for whatever reasons. They
are
> >     > forced to use the original CD which of course contains unpatched
> >     > code, then apply service pack and lord knows how many hot
> >     > fixes.[snip]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > What false
premise?  > face=Arial size=2> 
- Bob
> > Comer  
> >  
> > 
 > style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
> > BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> >   "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message  >
href="news:3e378899$1{at}w3.nls.net">news:3e378899$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >     
The first problem with
> >   George's rant is that it is based on a false
premise.
> >      >   size=2>Rich  
> >   
 >   style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
> >   BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> >     "Antti Kurenniemi" < >
href="Antti_Kurenniemi{at}hotmail.com&">mailto:Antti_Kurenniemi{at}hotmail.com">Antti_Kurenniemi{at}hotmail.com&
gt;
> >     wrote in message  >
href="news:3e3762ee{at}w3.nls.net">news:3e3762ee{at}w3.nls.net...That
> >     really sounds likea a good idea. Unfortunately I think it will
> >     probablynever happen :-(Antti
Kurenniemi"Geo."
> >     <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote
in
> >     message  >
href="news:3e374ea7{at}w3.nls.net">news:3e374ea7{at}w3.nls.net...>
> >     yes I read all about it. It occurs to me that a big part of
> >     the> problem with how they are dealing with
this problem
> >     is> actually related to copy protection. One
of the things
> >     that> causes all these unpatched machines to
continuously
> >     be> available is that people are always
doing new>
> >     installs/re-installs for whatever reasons. They are
forced>
to
> >     use the original CD which of course contains
unpatched> code,
> >     then apply service pack and lord knows how many> hot
> >    
fixes.[snip]
>
> --
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4