CH>RT>And, I think, Charles was pursuing a discussion about where Scott may
  >  >work instead of in a law enforcement related position. This type of
  >  >tangential nit picking and the ensuing retaliations is what got him
  >  >booted from AAC2, not some conspiracy of his perceived enemies.
CH>You ARE NOT the moderator of AskacopII, Ron.
Nope.  Never have been, never will be.  But I know what the fellow that
IS the moderator said about the situation and every time you accuse
me of being the cause of you getting booted, I'll dispute it.
  > You are NOT the moderator
  >of ANY askacop conference,
Nope.  Never have been, never will be.
  > although I recall some indication you tried
  >to weasel your way into becoming the moderator of this conference.
Thats one you can't back up Charlie.  If you recall ANYTHING about me,
moderators, and this conference, it was me trying to weasel Tom Rightmer
into the job.  It hasn't worked.....   yet.
  > You dont know what the moderator's reasons were for booting me
Well, I know that you and I disagree about the reasons and I know what
the moderator SAID was the reason he was going to boot you, and
then I know what he SAID was the reason he booted you.  What he SAID was
what I paraphrased in the quote at the top of this post.
I'm pretty sure Jeff monitors this conference.  Perhaps he will step in
and settle the question.
  >Again, why don't you stop these little games and post to and about
  >someone and something else?
It is time for that.  Make you a deal... you don't attack me, I won't
respond.  Fair enough?
---
 þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ This side up 
---------------