DB>> ...the attitude that if it was possible to provide that evidence,
DB>> you wouldn't provide it anyway.

RS> Bullshitting Dave... You can wait as eagerly as you like Dave... You
RS> will just have to do the research yourself if you want to chase it up.

DB> Despite your lengthy diatribe, thank you for proving my point exactly.

Jeezus you are stupid Dave. You dont appear to have the mental horsepower
to distinguish between not having what you want, to provide, and not
providing what you claim I do have available but choose not to provide.

Dont sweat it Dave, amazingly simple concept really.

DB>> When I requested more, you complained bitterly, but came ahead
DB>> and told me anyway.

RS> Complete crap. I said I didnt save it. So I couldnt quote it.

DB> I didn't say you had to *quote* it, just provide some form of
DB> additional information or reference;

I already told you repeatedly that that aint available Dave. If you
dont care to hear that, that just too bad Dave. As I said, if you want
more detail you will have to do the research yourself, coz I didnt
happen to save that stuff. If you dont want to do that research Dave,
thats fine, but lets not try to bombastically insist that I am choosing
not to provide what I could provide.

DB> and in the end, you didn't quote, you just told me what you could
DB> remember.  That's all I requested, that's all I got.  Where's your
DB> problem?

That you dont have the mental horsepower to grasp that whatever of that
that thread I could provide I have already provided. If you want more, you
will have to do that research yourself. Remarkably simple concept really.


Interesting that you chose to delete all the discussion on the detail of
what purport to be contracts and just kept the abusive stuff. Funny that.

--- PQWK202