Susan wrote:
> As a woman all I can say is this Hyerdahl person does not represent a
> woman's point of view. Most of us women consider people like her bitter
> freaks.
>
Unfortunately, we (men) have a problem sorting
the wheat from th chaps!

D.

>
> "Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
> news:1111793316.800668.235450{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>>Dustbin wrote:
>>
>>>Hyerdahl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hyerdahl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Society wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Viking" 
wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:1pq031t3v4uulq5jum5abii1ppsfe5v4h0{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>(EDIT)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It seems to me that a woman who can't make it in a
career might
>>>>>
>>>>>well>>>want to be a SAH mom, and that some men
would like nothing
>>
>>better.>However, women who are successful seem to be in the SITCity
>>crowd.
>>
>>>>>Not only do such women want to be SAH moms, but they must
>>>>>also compete with the successful women who also might
>>>>>want that "choice" as well.
>>>>
>>>>So what?  These days, more men seem to prefer women who can do it
>>
>>all.
>>
>>>>>The price such women pay for the "option" to
become a SAH mom
>>>>>when it suits them (or they need it) is to compete with
>>>>>other women for such available men.
>>>>
>>>>There's no contest.  Haven't you heard of the high divorce rate in
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>military, when men who marry women without skills end up divorcing
>>>>those women for a military-trained woman with skills?
>>>>
>>>>(Mark's self serving remarks deleted)>
>>>>
>>>> Nothing is "ruined".  Women who want careers can
and do have them;
>>>>
>>>
>>>Wind yer neck in, Hymendung, you and your kind
>>>are being discredited over and over again. You
>>>are only hanging on by the skin of your LIES.
>>
>>Do you have a debate point somewhere in all that chum?  Nah, didn't
>>think so.
>>
>>
>
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/29/05 8:46:42 AM ---