TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: mens_issues
to: All
from: Greg1199{at}yahoo.Com
date: 2005-01-07 10:40:00
subject: Re: A little free advice

_TR_ wrote:
> laurann{at}sprintmail.com wrote:
> > Phil #3 wrote:
> >>  wrote:
>
> >>> I have never been abusive or unfaithful.  She has been unfaithful
> >>> and currently has two boyfriends.  Most nights she does not sleep

> >>> at home but rather goes to her boyfriends after my girls are
asleep.
> >>
> >> Do not be surprised to find yourself charged, at least in the
> >> divorce, with domestic abuse or that your wife lives in fear of
> >> abuse from you.
> >
> > She will have to prove it.
> >
>
>
> No, she won't.  All she needs to do is accuse him, and nothing more.
Read
> that again:  NOTHING MORE.
>
> Ideally she should be compelled to prove her accusations, as the
> innocent-until-proven-guilty standard requires.  In practice, the
system
> dispenses altogether with the innocent-until-proven-guilty standard
when a
> woman accuses a man of transgressions against her.  It becomes HIS
> responsibility to prove himself innocent.  If she concocts a
sufficiently
> tearful story that nevertheless lacks any independent substatiation,
and if
> he does nothing to refute the accusation, then he WILL lose custody,
> judgements against him and possibly criminal trial.  That's what
feminism
> does for ya!  Aren't you so proud of your cult?

[...]

Ironically, he'd be better off in a criminal courtroom, where the
prosecutor would at least have to prove the charges against him, and he
would be entitled to a public defender.  Even in civil court, the
plaintiff would have to prove that the charges were more likely true
than untrue.  But in wild-west nightmare of family court, anything
goes.  The judge can say that he or she has to "err on the side of" the
child or the woman, so all she has to do is make the accusation, and it
will only be ignored if it's utterly ridiculous.

It's so skewed that she really needn't make this accusation.  The judge
isn't going to revoke her goddess-given right to presumed child custody
just because her pelvis is a public park.

The man could make the case that wifey's parade of lovers is a danger
to his kids, and this stands a chance of succeeding, but if she thinks
he may win custody, she'll bring out the heavy artillery, namely the
false accusation.  In general, I think men know that wifey will do what
it takes to win custody, however immoral it may be, so they don't want
to make her desperate.  Of course, then feminists bash men for not
seeking custody.
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 1/7/05 10:40:45 AM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.