-=> Quoting Dennis Menard to William Elliot <=-
 DM> The evidence seems to indicate the frame was opportunistic; maybe that
 DM> is why it is so sloppy and obvious; though he (ie, Abu-Jamal) was being
 DM> watched by the police because of his association; the Philly police
 DM> have never been able to explain how the .44 slug found in the slain
 DM> officer's brain was able to come from Mumia's .38 ...  Mumia was shot
 DM> at the scene by a police bullet ...  The bullet entered his body from
 DM> above, passed down through a lung, into his abdomen; awaking from
 DM> surgery, found himself handcuffed to the bed.
When I hear morons make absurd claims, I wonder first where they
got the false information and secondly how they imagine the
evidence fits into the big picture.  For example, were the cops
too stupid to plant the right caliber gun or bullet?  Was
Abdul-Jamama and his lawyer too stupid to notice (and inform the
jury of) the difference between a .44 and a .38 concerning the key
evidence?  If not, was everyone on the jury (including those who
weren't white) too racist to care about the difference (along
with every appeals court)?
While you're trying to come up with a story that isn't a total
joke, see if you can explain to me how Fuhrman framed OJ.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0066
---------------