-=> ROSS CASSELL wrote to JOHN MASSEY <=-

 RC> Hello John!

 RC> 26 Apr 10 20:38, you wrote to me:

 WC>>> Gee whiz Ed I had to issue "d100 enter" TWICE
your response such
 WC>>> as it might have been.

 WC>>> I'd rather have a debate with a parakeet.

 WC>>> Now roll over!

 RC>> A prime example of why this person see's himself as always the
 RC>> victim..

 RC>> He never starts anything, he walks on water..

 JM> What I don't understand is; For all his brilliance in everything from
 JM> nuclear science, to advanced economics, with a touch of computer
 JM> genius thrown in, not to forget a master of machinery, and all, why
 JM> isn't he rich? Or at least making enough to feed himself.

 RC> and dialectical thinking!!!!!!!!!!!

And you're onjection to that reasoned and quite effective sort of deducing
the truth from misinformation would be?

BTW, it's not "dialectical:, it's _dialectic_ thinking.

Seriously, what's your objection to thesis, antithesis yielding
synthesis?

It simply means taking all views and facts into account and deriving 
the facts from that collected information.


 RC> Well its like this...

 RC> * Right to work state.. (Flawduh)

That's a FACT.

 RC> * The Police are all corrupt and set out to get him and succeeded.

Now that's a strawman argument, exaggerating a point to the nth degree so as to
make 
it a false representation of what I've said.

Yup, A as in singular cop operating his vehicle did in fact cripple me. 
Heck he didn't even look old enough for the job.

I don't think he was "out to get me", I think he was trying to
incite a ticket
by tailgating me with his patrol car at 2 feet for ten blocks and was stupid
not 
to have backed off when he put me into a box between a raised median and three
cars all around, one behind, the patrol car, one in front and one to the west, 
middle lane side.

IOW's impossible to pull over ( I cannot drive through automobiles on my
motorcycle)
and approaching three more traffic lights in just two blocks, 1st N., 
Central Ave. and first S.

In point of FACT I've never had the first problem with any other police
department
anywhere in Florida, Tenneessee nor Massachussetts.
Just Saint Petersburg's PD ALONE.

Which is not to say I've not been ticketed elsewhere, I have but they
were for the most part legitimate.

I have watched them mess others over as well on two occassions, and the
response
of one public defender I went along with a friend to support as an eyewitness?

"They do that all the time, there's nothing to be done about it, plead
guilty."
That indivdual was NOT guilty as I was witness to.

That SPPD cop initiated a fight by first threatening to shoot a dog on that
individuals
property while said dog was held by me on a heavy lead and then by grabbing
that individual without cause while standing in their own yard.

I've repeatedly said quite clearly that had there been a second cop in the car
I don't 
believe it would have happened as I find two such idiots at a time a bit hard
to imagine.


 RC> In all fairness..

 RC> Smart people do stupid things, but this one never learned from
 RC> mistakes..

However in your world the police are not subject to mistakes?

You are trolling again Mr. Moderator.
Also engaging in passive - aggressive behavior as defined.

Oh such snuggly posts warm and fuzzy posts I've gotten from you of late since
I've recovered from my _neuological anomally_, I know you don't believe in
strokes.

Then comes the trolls, two in this one packet.

A leopard never losing his spots and it was quite anticipated. 

See, over the stroke, nothing over the line in regards to the rulz.

Now others can employ dialectic thinking and decide between us on their own.
Well except your few camp followers one of whom currently nipping at my heels.

"d200 enter" and a brief rejoiner quite easily addresses that one. 

Have a nice day Mr. moderator.



... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49