-=> BOB ACKLEY wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-

 BA> Replying to a message of WAYNE CHIRNSIDE to ROSS CASSELL:

 WC> Among a great many sources I employ is the rather
 WC> conservative Wall Street Journal
 WC> http://online.wsj.com/home-page


 WC> I do NOT go to either Fox or Al Jazeera for financial news
 WC> and in fact rarely visit either Fox or Al Jazeera as I
 WC> consider both approximately equally inaccurate though the
 WC> latter convinced me that Islam is NOT a religion of peace.

 WC> Both Fox News and Al Jazeera engage in propaganda, just of
 WC> different sorts.

 BA> Note that the WSJ is owned by the same outfit that owns Faux Noise.


I'm aware.

But than it's a question of looking at all sides of an issue
and arriving at a conclusion based upon opposing views to arrive
at a conclusion.

The WSJ at least made it into my 'news' bookmark fold.

Al Jazeera and Fox News made it as far as my blogs bookmarks
along with a number of liberal and conservative blogs.

Dialectic thinking.
Thesis, antithesis yeilding synthesis.

I was accused of looking this up via the internet by someone but
I'd actually learned this in Jr. H.S.

Anyhow how could one look it up not knowing it?

Sort of easy when I handed it to him but without knowing it?

Seems the accuser thought my definition too precise to the definition
when he looked it up.

Well how else would or could you describe it as other than the simple concept
it is?

Six words covers the entire meaning.

How can you not express that in simple and near identical terms?

... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49