Andre Lieven wrote:
> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> > viking wrote:
> >
> >> Women may buy more consumer goods, but that does not excuse the
> >> hatred and viciousness of TV ads against men.
> >>
> >> Women may buy more stuff, but that's _not_ an excuse for the
> >> anti-male hatred you see in TV ads.
> >
> > No, it doesn't. As far as things like the Verizon ad goes I think
it's
> > wrong to portray men in negative ways to pander to the women who
find
> > that empowering.
>
> Yet, those kinds of ads *work*, for *millions* of female customers,
> few to none of whomeven stop to raise a protest to the offending
> firm, never mind sending said firms a notice that as long as such
> misandristic ads run, they will not patronise such firm's wares.
>
> If millions of women DID raise such protests, such ads would vanish
> in a week. As it is, it's been thirty years, and the ads are still
> running. That speaks to *women's acceptance* of their messages.
>
> > That's not all women, contrary to what seems to be the consensus
here.

Weasel word and generally weak language noted.

> No proof offered ? Claim fails. You do that, a lot, just like....
> Feminists...
>
> > Some of us love men,

And you show it by watching these adds, giving them a good belly laugh,
and buying whatever useless knick-knack they're selling, filling your
house with so much debris.  Then after a hard day of shopping,
manicures, and facials, bought with someone else's money, you come to
soc.men to castigate men for whatever reason you can find, valid or
not.

Even if I thought you loved men, I still wouldn't let the
goose-stepping buzzcuts hide behind your skirt, little lady.

> No proof offered ? Claim fails. Go DO something that *proves* your
> claim. Read Farrell, read Braver, read Sommers, and then you might
> have some basis for one of your claims.
>
> > even if we don't always agree with them.
>
> But, if a man disagrees with a woman, thats " misogyny ", eh ?
>
>  Hypocrite .
>
> Andre

She gets thoroughly trounced when she encounters a soc.men regular,
like yourself, and the reason is obvious.

Bluesmammon is like an airplane model enthusiast who goes to the
Lockheed Skunkworks to argue against their design of the F-22.  She
doesn't realize that the Lockheed engineers are thoroughly experienced
in the design of fighters, and that they've already heard her
arguments.  To them, it's old news, so they just brush her aside, and
she stomps off into the desert.

We in soc.men have heard so many feminazi flames that nothing she says
is new or surprising to us, and having slammed such flames before, we
can easily crush hers, which prompts her to run to the proverbial
bathroom and cry.
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 1/10/05 11:42:10 AM