From: "Robert G Lewis"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C68CBE.4B5515A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In this case Windows XP does identify it correctly in Device Manager as = a
RealTek 97 audio , I do not recall any problems when I installed XP = but
that was a long time ago. I do see some entries in the registry = relating
to NVIDIA for sound in and out but that may be related to the = one time I
allowed the driver to be 'updated'. After removing it I had = no further
problems with audio or system (KB 833846).=20
Windows Update wants to give me "NVIDIA(R) nForce(TM) Audio Codec =
Interface"for it. I misspoke when I said device driver .The MB does
have = NVIDIA components just not the audio hardware and this file WILL
cause = my system to be unstable.
Not a big deal. just enough for me to not trust Windows Update fully. =
Given the variations possible in hardware and software configurations I =
consider this to be understandable.
"Rich" wrote in message news:448b497b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
This is all keyed off the PCI ID which the hardware provides. =
Unless you are trying to ID ISA devices something like a modem it is the =
hardware that is responsible for identifying both itself and the devices =
with which it is compatible. On Windows XP open the device manager, =
select the device of interest, right click, pick Properties, then select =
the Details tab. The categories of interest here are Hardware Ids and =
Compatible Ids. For example, my video adapter provides the following =
hardware IDs
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_043110B0&REV_A1
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_043110B0
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&CC_030000
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&CC_0300
and the following compatible IDs
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&REV_A1
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322
PCI\VEN_10DE&CC_030000
PCI\VEN_10DE&CC_0300
PCI\VEN_10DE
PCI\CC_030000
PCI\CC_0300
How the device driver is selected from these IDs is explained at =
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279112. I didn't read through the =
article so I don't know if it points out one gotcha that are = particularly
relevant to OEM devices like nvidia display adapters. The = gotcha is that
the OEMs make changes but forget to change the PCI IDs. = In other words,
multiple incompatible devices claim to be the same or = compatible. I
don't have this issue with any of my current hardware but = I have two
friends/family that have systems with OEM nvidia adapters = that claim to
be compatible with the nvidia drivers but don't work = unless you use
customized OEM drivers. This sounds exactly like the = problem you have
only I think both these folks are using dell systems = not asus systems.
Rich
"Robert G Lewis" wrote in message =
news:448b193f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
"Rich Gauszka" wrote in message=20
news:448b1020$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert G Lewis" wrote in message=20
> news:448b05af$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>
>> Optional Hardware update, They are apparently misidentifying some =
of my=20
>> hardware ( for 2+years now). Not something that gives me a log of =
>> confidence in their hardware identification . Technically its =
not a MS=20
>> Driver ( from NVIDIA ) but they are the ones deciding I may need =
it.
>>
>
> One time I blue screened and hosed my system with an internal =
modem update=20
> WU thought I should have. Stayed away form Microsoft's hardware =
update=20
> recommendations ever since
>
That will teach a lesson . I am concerned that after 2 YEARS it =
still=20
seems to mis identify the hardware. I don't think ASUS is exactly an =
unknown=20
MB maker/
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C68CBE.4B5515A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In this case Windows XP does identify it correctly =
in Device=20
Manager as a RealTek 97 audio , I do not recall any problems when I = installed XP=20
but that was a long time ago. I do see some entries in the registry = relating to=20
NVIDIA for sound in and out but that may be related to the one time I = allowed=20
the driver to be 'updated'. After removing it I had no further problems = with=20
audio or system (KB 833846).
Windows Update wants to give me "NVIDIA(R) =
nForce(TM) Audio=20
Codec Interface"for it. I misspoke when I said device driver .The MB =
does have=20
NVIDIA components just not the audio hardware and this file WILL cause = my system=20
to be unstable.
Not a big deal. just enough for me to not trust =
Windows Update=20
fully. Given the variations possible in hardware and software = configurations I=20
consider this to be understandable.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:448b497b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
This is
all keyed off =
the PCI ID=20
which the hardware provides. Unless you are trying to ID ISA =
devices=20
something like a modem it is the hardware that is responsible for =
identifying=20
both itself and the devices with which it is compatible. On =
Windows XP=20
open the device manager, select the device of interest, right click, =
pick=20
Properties, then select the Details tab. The categories of =
interest here=20
are Hardware Ids and Compatible Ids. For example, my video =
adapter=20
provides the following hardware IDs
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_043110B0&REV_A1PCI\=
VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_043110B0PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&am=
p;CC_030000PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&CC_0300
and the following compatible =
IDs
PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&REV_A1PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_032=
2PCI\VEN_10DE&CC_030000PCI\VEN_10DE&CC_0300PCI\VEN_10=
DEPCI\CC_030000PCI\CC_0300
How the device driver is selected =
from these IDs=20
is explained at http://support.microsoft" target="new">http://support.microsoft.=">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279112">http://support.microsoft.=
com/kb/279112. =20
I didn't read through the article so I don't know if it points out one =
gotcha=20
that are particularly relevant to OEM devices like nvidia display=20
adapters. The gotcha is that the OEMs make changes but forget to =
change=20
the PCI IDs. In other words, multiple incompatible devices claim =
to be=20
the same or compatible. I don't have this issue with any of my =
current=20
hardware but I have two friends/family that have systems with OEM =
nvidia=20
adapters that claim to be compatible with the nvidia drivers but don't =
work=20
unless you use customized OEM drivers. This sounds exactly like =
the=20
problem you have only I think both these folks are using dell systems =
not asus=20
systems.
Rich
"Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
message news:448b193f$1{at}w3.nls.net..."Rich=20
Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com>
=
wrote in=20
message news:448b1020$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>>=20
"Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
message > news:448b05af$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>>>>>>=20
Optional Hardware update, They are apparently misidentifying some of =
my=20
>> hardware ( for 2+years now). Not something
that gives =
me a log=20
of >> confidence in their hardware identification =
<g>.=20
Technically its not a MS >> Driver ( from NVIDIA ) but =
they are=20
the ones deciding I may need
it.>>>> One =
time I blue=20
screened and hosed my system with an internal modem update > =
WU=20
thought I should have. Stayed away form Microsoft's hardware update =
>=20
recommendations ever since>That
will teach a lesson=20
<g>. I am concerned that after 2 YEARS it still
seems to =
mis=20
identify the hardware. I don't think ASUS is exactly an unknown =
MB=20
maker/
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C68CBE.4B5515A0--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267
|